Published: 1:41 PM 12/29/2009
by Frank Valentyn
There is little doubt that there has been alien influence on the planet, concerning both genetic and memetic-cultural influence. Much of the “clear-cut” history of this is however the creation of imaginative minds that dare allocate actual names, titles, times and events to such input, where in actuality a vanishingly small volume of traceable percept of such protohistory exists in the material domain.
Things like the Piri-Reis map, millennia-old lenses and batteries (primitive and therefore secondary emulations of more functional originals); the Nazca-Plain lines, submarine pyramids off the Bermudas, the exceptionally high-tech Maya calendrical functions, the Indian Vimana myths with their vast and lengthy technical descriptions, the Epic of Gilgamesh and many others validate the existence of at least one phase, if not several, of a highly advanced technocratic civilization.
The presently overwhelming and scientifically undeniable evidence proving the existence of extraterrestrial visits to our planet, obtained by technically and professionally qualified observers (military and airline pilots, ATC’s, technical personnel, etc.) is a vital input to these considerations.
Answers to the ancient question of “where do we come from” mostly suffer from a simplistic, reductionistic perspective that ranges from instant creation in 4004 BC to Darwinian evolutionary mechanisms. Both these polar extremes of modeling our protohistory lack vital considerations.
Without going into expanded detail, epigenetic modulation of the basic zygotic DNA template (Albert Jeltsch at Jacobs University, Bremen, Germany, Yoichi Shinkai at Kyoto University, Japan, and Xiaodong Cheng at Emory University) proves that embryogenesis consists of far more than just “parental sexual input” by gametous recombination; it is also now well recognised that neonates are born with a distinct personality (Professor Annalena Venneri of the University of Hull) – not as empty neurological slates programmable by an over-simplified view of a very obsolete “Nature and Nurture” perspective; morphogenetic influence during molecular embryogenesis lending strong evidence to the operation of morphogenetic fields (evidence from, among others, The Gariaev Group, the DNA Phantom effect; Gurwitsch, Spemann, Weiss, Sheldrake, etc.) as compared to simple, deterministic cellular differentiation; the discovery of in excess of a hundred heavy molecular species in protostellar molecular clouds (Hoyle, Wickramasinghe, NASA,) including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and glycine, the simplest amino acid; advanced structural organic inclusions in type II carbonaceous chondrites (Allende, Murchison) and vastly more.
This subject alone deserves expanded treatment such as I have given it in my foundational work, “The Nature of Being,” 550 pages, 176 illustrations, over 2300 index entries.
One of our species’ greatest challenges is the objective modelling of extended reality – through our advanced technical instrumentation we are capable of exploring both the extended cosmological macrocosm and the vanishing edges of the microdomain, yet much of our interpretations of what we meet there are heavily coloured by religionistic idealism and obsolescent metaphysics in paradigmatic entrenchments that acutely hold back our psychospiritual development As consequence this also retards our inter-harmonic synergy between the many fractious cultural groups of our young species.
The ideal, something to aim for in escaping all that has the potential for restricting and retarding the evolution of our potentials, is a gestaltic, holistic insight – a closer approximation to more ultimate, objective reality. No doubt, there are as many subjective realities as there are individuals on the planet – yet this does not negate the insight that there is a primary cosmogonic causal evolution in the miraculous universe we have the privilege to inhabit and explore. For those who are not familiar with the concept of a gestalt, or gestaltic insight, of which J. L. Read asserts, that “Anyone who has had an insight or an intuitive answer to a problem, knows these thoughts appear spontaneously as complete gestalts,” such gestalts are not easy to communicate in serial, linear forms of communication.
They require a type of multi-parallel perception which is certainly a function of individual psychospiritual evolution. The ambiguity implicit here is that in their clearly paradigmatic formats, such models of reality can include both the polar extremes, of complete mismodelling such as geocentrism or medieval abiogenesis, as well as far more conceptually accurate models – the latter often rejected by those stuck in lower levels of personal development.
Once again we balance on the edge of ambiguity when we consider our origins – the planet is geologically ancient enough to have allowed the natural evolution of several, now totally sublimated civilizations with highly advanced reality-modelling and concomitant cultural and technological levels.
The universe is full, rather than empty… What perhaps needs concern us more at present than our protohistory, fascinating as it may well be, is steering the global consciousness towards harmonic holism and a sense of collective and individual purpose that is mutually synergistic, inspiring and supportive, and aim to the stars – this, the enigmatically whirling ball in space that is our home, is our cradle – we are meant to mature beyond it and colonize the furthest reaches in a non-interfering way – part of galactic, universal society that no doubt monitors our progress with some care, justified doubt, and perhaps some apprehension.
We need to desperately mature beyond the capricious adolescence that presently marks and mars our very young species, much of our culture locked into the static, obsolescent and non-evolutionary – and the first step is more holistic, more accurate modelling.
Sincerely,
Frank Valentyn
Tech. Mgr. De-Stress Refuge Wellness Centre / Centaur Communication Systems; ICPKP Kinesiologist
www.de-stress-refuge.com
