Published: 7:47 AM 12/7/2009

[Editor's Note: Michael, who is one of the UFO Casebook Forum Global Moderators, and, in my opinion, one of the most informed reseachers on the so-called "Drone" UFOs, sent me the case file below. The information was copied from his blog, UFO-Blog.com.]

Dragonfly Drone UFO Report - Ohio (2nd August 2009)

I'll admit I was hesitant in posting this firstly because the witness sounds overly familiar with the debacle that was the California Drones (2007), what with phrases like, “winged object like a dragonfly drone” & “holographic image being projected” and secondly after watching the video and looking at the image I can't for the life of me see what the witness is referring to!!

However due to the inexorable allegations of, “HOAX!!” which were justifiably levelled at the original Drone reports and as this witness drew the correlation between their report and the original Drone hoax themselves I thought what the hell as if nothing else -and as I've said several times previously- it shows the lingering appeal that the original Drone reports/images had and the dogged determination with which the (original) Drones themselves seem to exude whilst they strive for myth-status.

A status which will never be achieved due in no small part to the anonymous witnesses, their CGI images, their self-evident & outright deceptive statements in which they apparently lied about everything, from their names to their email addresses. And of course more telling was the fact that *every* location discovered to date has been coupled with the discovery that the original witness statement was inexcusably blatant lies, and not just about the physical location but the entire back-story was exposed as no more than fantasy.

The Rajman1977 report is a prime example of this as it showed undeniably that the timeframe in which the Drone was alleged to have been captured was a physical impossibility!! This of course being due to the distance between the locations where it was claimed the images were captured being impossible to traverse in the allotted time dictated by the time-stamp on the images, which in turn directly condemned the entire witness statement as a fabrication.

Anyway the following was submitted to Mufon on the 5th December 2009 and was accompanied by an mpeg video and an image (which as I mention above is entirely inconclusive), links to these are located below the following report:

Detail for Event ID 20890

Case Number: 20890

Log Number: US-12052009-0011

Submitted Date: 2009-12-05 22:01 GMT

Event Date: 2009-08-02 00:00 GMT

Status: Submitted

City: Cincinnati

Region: Ohio

Country: US

Longitude: -84.472

Latitude: 39.0975

Shape: Other

Description:

I was near the I-75 and I-475 exchange in Cincinnati, OH and it was almost completely dark and I was observing a strange shape in a cloud that I had noticed earlier in the day and was trying to photograph it but it was too dark to get a clear shot. I switched to video mode at the end to capture the essence of the enviornment I was in.

At the time I could not clearly see the object floating in the foreground however I could tell there was something there. It was only after reviewing the short video that I could see the object and by then it was completely dark and I lost sight of it.

My first impression after seeing the video was that it was a nearly transparent winged object like a dragonfly drone that was completely silent. It was the same shape as the hole in the cloud that I had been trying to photograh and it's possible it could have been some type of holographic image being projected from or connected to the cloud. It's easiest the see the object with the video size in Media Player set to 50%.

Originally posted to UFO-Blog.com: